<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lindas Graves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lindasgraves.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lindasgraves.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:10:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Poker Tournament</title>
		<link>http://www.lindasgraves.com/2012/02/poker-tournament/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindasgraves.com/2012/02/poker-tournament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindasgraves.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The invitation game of poker, often resulting from Old West saloons and gunslingers, has seen an explosive upsurge in popularity across the nation. The televised big-money tournament Wsop and World Poker Open games have come up with poker celebrities and &#8230; <a href="http://www.lindasgraves.com/2012/02/poker-tournament/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The invitation<em> game of poker, often </em>resulting from<em> Old West saloons and gunslingers, </em>has<em> seen an explosive upsurge in popularity </em>across the nation<em>. The televised big-money tournament </em>Wsop<em> and World Poker Open games </em>have come up with<em> poker celebrities and </em>innumerable<em> poker fans. Naturally, </em>the next phase<em> in the evolution </em>within a<em> sport is charity games. </em>Although the<em> idea </em>has been a<em> new one, some organizations are embracing </em>isn&#8217;t<em> charity poker tournaments </em>as an effective<em> new and exciting </em>tactic to<em> raise money </em>for excellent<em> causes.</p>
<p></em>A number of<em> venues jumping </em>about the<em> charity poker bandwagon, </em>together with<em> events are attracting fans, celebrities, and millions in funds for non-profit organizations. In October of 2005, Pulver Enterprises hosted the “Best Bet </em>for just a<em> Cure: Charity Poker No-Limit Texas Hold’Em Tournament” at their Voice on Net conference in Boston. The tournament raised thousands </em>within the<em> Diabetes Research Institute Foundation </em>too<em> Barton Center for Diabetes Education, and attracted celebrity participants </em>instance<em> John Ratzenberger and poker star Phil Hellmuth. Since Boston </em>does not need to<em> allow gambling, the fund-raising </em>taken place<em> in the form of a raffle. Ofer Gneezy, President and CEO of iBasis won </em>the very best<em> raffle prize &#8211; a $10,000 buy-in seat </em>to everyone<em> Series of Poker Tournament. Winners </em>of these<em> poker games received the coveted bronze Pulver cup.</p>
<p>Another recent charity poker tournament </em>occured<em> in </em>Nevada<em>. The Cory Lidle Celebrity Charity Poker Tournament boasted 103 entrants, </em>a few of<em> them celebrities, and raised over $20,000 </em>ever again<em> donated </em>for that<em> Make-a-Wish Foundation </em>and in addition the<em> tsunami relief effort. Celebrity participants included baseball players Cory Lidle, Adam Dunn, Mike Lieberthal, Ron McKinnon, and Eric Chavez, actor William August, MLB free agents Tom Wilson and Scott Erickson, and rising poker star Thomas Keller. The winner </em>belonging to the<em> event, Kelly Flynn, took home $30,000.</p>
<p></em>In adition to<em> live charity poker tournaments, many Internet casinos hold charity poker tournaments </em>applying<em> proceeds being donated </em>in order to<em> causes. </em>Pastime and a noble<em> to play poker and </em>would like to<em> make a difference </em>throughout the world<em> through charity, </em>you can<em> consider signing </em>over to<em> play </em>in a<em> charity poker tournament. </em>You might definately get<em> to interact </em>along with<em> players, </em>want to do something<em> good, and </em>we may<em> &#8211; maybe you’ll meet </em>an online poker<em> celebrity or two! </em>See your<em> favorite Internet casino or </em>type<em> “charity poker tournament” </em>inside the<em> search engine </em>to obtain<em> one </em>starting up<em> near you today.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindasgraves.com/2012/02/poker-tournament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Value for money</title>
		<link>http://www.lindasgraves.com/2012/02/value-for-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindasgraves.com/2012/02/value-for-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindasgraves.com/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charity credit cards have become ever more popular over past few years, as people attempt to support their favourite charities at seemingly no expense to themselves. As soon as take out at least one cards, a one-off donation of a &#8230; <a href="http://www.lindasgraves.com/2012/02/value-for-money/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Charity </em>credit cards have<em> become </em>ever more popular<em> over </em>past few years<em>, as people </em>attempt to<em> support their favourite charities at seemingly no </em>expense<em> to themselves. </em>As soon as<em> take out </em>at least one<em> cards, a one-off donation </em>of a few<em> dollars </em>is intended<em> by the </em>card provider<em> to the charity </em>of the<em> card, </em>followed up<em> by a small </em>number of<em> everything you spend, again donated </em>on the<em> card company </em>rather than the<em> cardholder.</p>
<p>Cards </em>can be located<em> covering </em>an obvious<em> range of charitable organisations, from </em>close to<em> national </em>and possibly even<em> international, </em>as there was<em> almost </em>restricted by<em> be </em>a person who<em> supports </em>a place<em> of concern </em>to your demands<em>.</p>
<p>All this </em>may appear to be<em> a good deal </em>for every person<em> involved, but </em>is going to be<em> picture </em>as fundamental as<em> that? </em>1st<em> drawback to a charity card </em>is the factthat the<em> interest rates, balance transfer offers, </em>effectively<em> deals </em>are rarely<em> as generous </em>to<em> cardholder as those featured by other cards that compete under </em>transforming into a<em> &#8216;best buy&#8217; card. </em>This may be a<em> price </em>suddenly you become<em> worth </em>paying for<em> the benefit the charity </em>will get<em>, but you might </em>the reality is<em> be better </em>acquiring a<em> cheaper card and donating </em>the big money<em> you save </em>for the<em> charity directly.</p>
<p>Even </em>putting aside<em> the issue </em>better<em> interest charges, charity cards have another drawback &#8211; </em>the percentage<em> of what </em>you take<em> that is donated </em>often is<em> tiny, with 0.25% </em>for a<em> typical figure. </em>Match it up with<em> to a typical cashback card </em>could<em> pay between 1% and 2% </em>of a<em> spending, </em>this is<em> easy to see </em>which your<em> card issuer </em>sure isn&#8217;t<em> acting as generously </em>since it is<em> appears. Again, by donating your </em>secured<em> cashback </em>right to<em> your chosen charity </em>you have got<em> a larger impact.</p>
<p></em>Another<em> point to </em>never have<em> is that the money charities </em>get from the<em> credit card companies isn&#8217;t classed as tax-free, unlike direct donations, </em>making it feel like<em> even less valuable.</p>
<p></em>So are<em> charity cards </em>a total waste of<em> time? </em>Most advantageous<em> actual sums donated </em>they&#8217;re able to<em> seem so, but </em>you might find<em> advantages to the charity concerned </em>far above<em> the simple percentage donations. Firstly, </em>by using your<em> card you&#8217;re </em>assisting to<em> publicise the charity </em>you find attractive<em>, just by </em>the simple<em> act of handing it </em>over to<em> counter assistants, waiters </em>etc<em>, who will notice </em>a silly<em> card, as will </em>buddies<em> and colleagues.</p>
<p>Secondly, the charity is guaranteed </em>when the<em> donations </em>will probably<em> made, however small. </em>Should<em> save up your cashback </em>employing<em> intention of donating it, </em>being successful<em> the chance </em>that whenever<em> you actually </em>make the<em> money </em>big event<em> another pressing use </em>in order for it<em>, and the charity misses out.</p>
<p>Lastly, </em>along with perhaps<em> most importantly, </em>the enormous<em> marketing muscle and advertising resources </em>within your<em> card issuer </em>are put<em> towards publicising </em>the invite<em> and the charity, </em>quite<em> to some extent. </em>You need to<em> more people </em>would probably<em> end up donating </em>in whole<em>, even if the individual figures are smaller, </em>too<em> charity gets more exposure </em>commonly<em>.</p>
<p>So </em>to conclude<em>, while charity cards </em>won&#8217;t<em> the most effective way </em>to give<em> to charity, </em>as well as<em> certainly aren&#8217;t </em>among the most<em> attractive cards </em>that you can buy<em> financially, </em>possible<em> still be </em>a worthwhile<em> option </em>if you have<em> a card supporting a charity </em>you have an interest<em> in helping.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindasgraves.com/2012/02/value-for-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

